2 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
User Gravatar
Casey T said in July 7th, 2010 at 11:05 am

Bill,

Thanks for these articles. Let me ask you: how do churches embedded in connectional denominations (UMC) engage in this sort of turnaround?

Here’s what I’m thinking right now. The United Methodist Church is currently designed to have equal representation of lay people and clergy. There’s a good history behind that, but giving everyone a vote doesn’t always allow missional flexibility. On the other hand, apostolic leadership seems to bypass the democracy that can sometimes inhibit radical ministry.

So again, how do you open up opportunities for radical ministry when every move you make bumps into a denominational rule?

User Gravatar
Bill T-B said in July 8th, 2010 at 8:25 am

First, a comment about “Voting” in church. There were only two votes taken in the New Testament … and both ended up in what appeared to be disasters. Take a moment to ponder … what two votes were taken?

If you said, “The calling of Matthias to replace Judas,” you’d be echoing an answer I’ve heard for years – but no awards. Matthias was called by casting lots (drawing straws, tossing dice, picking a number between one-and-ten, etc. … no voting here).

Give up? I’ll give you a hint. The first “vote” put an innocent man to death and the second ended up sinking a ship.

In all four Gospels, Jesus is sentenced to death when the majority in the mob makes it clear they want him crucified. And in Acts 27, the crew of the ship votes to sail on, against Paul’s prophesy, and the ship wrecks on the rocks.

Voting is a very American way of life … and it seems to work pretty well for a democracy. But in a church? Biblically, when did the majority ever get it right?

Okay, that doesn’t answer your question, but perhaps it provides a modicum of insight as to the state and perhaps the fate of many US churches.

How do you pull off a missional transformation in a Mainline church that’s governed by Roberts Rules of Order (or facsimile thereof)?

Start with step one of this series. Successful church transformations are always leadership dependent and always begin with a leader who not only has a vision, but who is self-differentiated enough to pursue that vision and to model the behaviors that go along with it.

Then look again at step two. That step is all about vision casting. Unless a leader can “sell” the vision to the congregation in such a way that it is absolutely compelling, s/he is dead in the water.

Once you have steps one and two in hand, the rest falls into place. It’s not an overnight task. Indeed, we know that turning a church around takes five or more years. But it is possible if the leadership leads, models, and casts a compelling vision.

Leave A Reply

 Username (Required)

 Email Address (Remains Private)

 Website (Optional)